Reproducibility Quick Check

Repository:B1607/ATPirP
Checked on May 27, 2026 at 7:47 PM
4/15

We scanned the repository's file structure, dependency files, and README against common reproducibility signals. This is a static surface-level check — for a deep, AI-driven code review, run a full audit.

Documentation

1/4
README file found
Setup and usage instructions in README

README has usage instructions but no setup steps

LICENSE file found

No LICENSE file found

CITATION file found

No CITATION.cff or citation file found

Dependencies

0/3
Dependency file found

No requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, or other pip/conda dependency file found

Dependencies are version-pinned or locked

No lock file found and most dependencies lack version constraints

Python version specified

No .python-version or requires-python constraint found

Code Quality

1/4
.gitignore file found

No .gitignore file found

Test files found

No test files or tests/ directory found

Linter or formatter configured

No ruff, black, flake8, or other linter/formatter config found

No large binaries committed (>10 MB)

Reproducibility

2/4
Dockerfile or devcontainer

No Dockerfile, docker-compose, or .devcontainer found

Random seed handling mentioned

No mention of random seeds or reproducibility settings

No hardcoded absolute paths
Data access documented

The full audit goes deeper

Our AI agent explores your entire codebase to surface insights no static check can see.

Expert-level codebase exploration

Reads and reasons about your code the way a senior reviewer would — catches unclear docs, misleading comments, and subtle quality issues no static check can see

Context-aware, adaptive analysis

Every audit is custom-tailored — adapts its investigation based on what it finds, focusing on the files and patterns that matter for your specific project

Concrete fix suggestions for every issue

Provides specific, actionable recommendations for each finding so you know exactly what to change and why

Paper vs. code comparison

Verifies that your code implements what the manuscript claims

Clone-to-results walkthrough

Traces the full path from git clone to reproduced results

Hidden non-determinism detection

Surfaces subtle sources like set ordering, race conditions, and implicit sorts

Seed propagation tracing

Verifies all randomness sources are properly seeded, not just the obvious ones

External data link verification

Confirms that Zenodo, Figshare, and HuggingFace URLs actually resolve

Known vulnerability scan

Flags dependencies with published security advisories

Code complexity, dead code, and duplication detection

Identifies unmaintainable hotspots, unused code paths, and duplicated logic

Secrets and credentials scan

Catches leaked API keys, tokens, and hardcoded passwords

And more — with new checks shipping regularly

We're continuously adding new analyses based on the latest reproducibility research and user feedback

Unlock the full audit experience

A full audit takes about 10 minutes — it explores your codebase the way a senior reviewer would, tracing dependencies, verifying paper claims against code, and surfacing hidden issues with concrete fix suggestions.

Get Early Access
Deep agentic code explorationPaper + code alignmentActionable insights